期刊文献+

解读实质解释论与形式解释论之对立 被引量:1

Interpretation on the contradiction between legal formalism and legal realism
收藏 分享 导出
摘要 目前在我国刑法学界,关于刑法解释方法论的争议主要是围绕实质解释论与形式解释论展开的.实质解释论与形式解释论的对立最早发端于德日刑法学,但当下我国刑法学界所讨论的两种解释论又有其新的内涵与范畴.笔者在本文将对实质解释论与形式解释论的初识焦点、在我国刑法学界新的发展以及两者之对立进行解读,以期在刑法解释的进路上作出合理的选择. Currently in our country’s criminal law system, interpretation methods are mainly focused around formalism and realism. The two methodologies originated from German and Japanese criminal law systems, but showed new features in content and scope in our country’s criminal law discussions. The writer interprets the original focus of legal formalism and legal realism and their development in our academic circle of criminal law system, in the hope that reasonable choices may be made in criminal law interpretation.
作者 陆璐 Lu Lu(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088,China)
出处 《佳木斯教育学院学报》 2013年第5期共2页 Journal of Jiamusi Education Institute
关键词 实质解释论 形式解释论 构成要件 罪刑法定 解释的界限 legal realism legal formalism constitutive requirements no penalty without a law interpretation scope
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献104

共引文献473

同被引文献4

引证文献1

投稿分析

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈