期刊文献+

市场机制下机组启动费用的分摊研究 被引量:10

STUDY ON ALLOCATION OF UNIT START-UP COSTS UNDER POWER MARKET ENVIRONMENT
收藏 分享 导出
摘要 尝试运用基于合作博弈的成本分摊理论来分摊机组启动费用。研究了机组启动费用分摊的核的存在性问题,并指出该分摊不一定是凸博弈。分析了核仁分摊法和Shapley值分摊法的特点和适用范围,对比了两者的优缺点。此外,对机组空载费用的分摊问题也进行了有益的探索。文中,提出采用分时段分摊法和整体分摊法两种方法来分摊多时段的机组启动费用,并对比研究了两者的分摊结果。所提出的分摊方法与现有方法相比,在分摊合理性和公平性方面存在理论上的优势。数值算例结果表明,提出的分摊方法是公平、有效的。 Cooperative game theory is applied to allocating unit start-up costs among loads. The existence conditions of core allocation are studied with the conclusion that the allocation problem is not always a convex game drawn. Based on the concepts of nucleolus and Shapley value, the start-up costs are allotted to each load. The advantages and shortcomings of the two methods are examined. The allocation of unit no-load costs is also studied. Then multi-period start-up cost allocation problem is studied, and two methods are suggested. In the first method, multi-period start-up cost is allocated based on the allocation outcome of single-period allocation, while in the second method multi-period start-up cost of a trading day is allocated as a whole. The allocation results are compared. Contrasted with existing methods, the suggested allocation methods have theoretical advantage in assurance of equity and rationality. It is believed that the proposed methods for allocation of unit startup costs are equitable and can be potentially useful.
作者 胡朝阳 甘德强 韩祯祥 DebChattopadhyay Hu Zhaoyang , Gan Deqiang , Han Zhenxiang , Deb Chattopadhyay (Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China) (Charles River Associates (Asia Pacific) Limited, Wellington, New Zealand)
出处 《电力系统自动化》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第20期1-6,11共7页 Automation of Electric Power Systems
基金 浙江省自然科学基金青年人才培养项目(R503198)~~
关键词 机乙组启动 费用分摊 凸博弈 核仁分摊法 Shapley值分摊法 机组空载费用 机组组合 start-up of generator cost allocation core convex game nucleolus Shapley value no-load costs unit commitment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1刘德铭 黄振高.对策论及其应用(Game Theory and Application)[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社(Changsha:National Defence,1994.. 被引量:1
  • 2周明 孙树栋.遗传算法原理及应用(Genetic Algorithms:Theory and Applications)[M].北京:国防工业出版社(Beijing:National Defence Indus,2001.. 被引量:1
  • 3[4]Conejo A J, Galiana F D, Kockar Ivana. Z-bus Loss Allocation. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 105~110 被引量:1
  • 4[5]Rau N S. Transmission Loss and Congestion Cost Allocation--An Approach Based on Responsibility. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1401~1409 被引量:1
  • 5[6]Alberto Berizzi, Cristian Bovo, Paolo Marannino. Allocation of Transmission Losses in Presence of Both Bilateral and Pool Market Models. In: Proceedings of 22nd IEEE Power Engineering Society International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications. Sydney(Australia): 2001. 336~341 被引量:1
  • 6[7]Galiana F D, Conejo A J, Kockar Ivana. Incremental Transmission Loss Allocation Under Pool Dispatch. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002, 17(1): 26~33 被引量:1
  • 7[8]Tan X, Lie T T. Application of the Shapley Value on Transmission Cost Allocation in the Competitive Power Market Environment. IEE Proceedings--Gener, Transm & Distrib, 2002, 149(1): 15~20 被引量:1
  • 8Bushnell J, Stoft S. Transmission and Generation Investment in a Competitive Electric Power Industry. Power Report PWP-030,California: University of California Energy Institute, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Hogan W W. Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1992, 4(3). 被引量:1
  • 10Peyton Y H. Cost Allocation, Demand Revelation, and Core Implementation. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1998, 36 (3) :213-228. 被引量:1

共引文献45

同被引文献69

引证文献10

二级引证文献40

投稿分析

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈