期刊文献+

整体性治理模式的兴起——整体性治理在英国政府治理中的理论与实践 被引量:22

The Rising of Holistic Governance Model:Theory And Practice of Holistic Governance in UK
分享 导出
摘要 政府治理一直是政府和学界非常关注的问题,在西方,随着信息化、数字化技术的普遍使用,已经兴起了与信息时代相适应的政府治理新模式,即整体性治理,它主要是针对新公共管理带来的碎片化、空心化政府等一系列问题而提出,强调整体与合作和信息时代背景。整体性治理成为当代政府治理新理念,也是探究政府改革的学术前沿领域,因此,对之研究具有重要的理论和现实意义。本文介绍了整体性治理理论在英国兴起的时代背景,同时详细阐述了整体性治理的一般概念和核心特征,介绍了其实际运用情况,分析了它存在的障碍和缺陷,并对其前景进行展望。通过对其进行较全面的介绍,以期引起对这一理论模式的学术重视与探讨。 Governance is always a considerable issue.In west,with the general use of digital and information technology,a new governance model matched information era is rising--holistic governance,which is brought mainly because the series of problems,such as fragmented and hollow government resulted from NPM.Holistic governance emphasizes integrated,coordinated and information era background.This paper introduces the background of the rising of holistic governance theory in UK,and reviews the idea of holistic governance.Through its introduction,we can understand this theory model thoroughly and have more researches on it.
作者 翁士洪 Weng Shihong
机构地区 复旦大学
出处 《上海行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期 51-58,共8页 The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
关键词 政府 信息时代 治理理论 整体性治理 Holistic Governance Information Era Governance Theory Government
作者简介 作者简介:翁士洪男(1979-)复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院公共行政学系研究生
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12. 被引量:1
  • 2Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 3Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. 被引量:1
  • 4Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming). 被引量:1
  • 5Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93. 被引量:1
  • 6Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37. 被引量:1
  • 7Hood, C. (2005). The idea of Joined - Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.) , Joined - Up Government. British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Hood, C. and H. Rothstein (2001). Risk regulation under pressure. Problem Solving or Blame Shifting? Administration and Society, vol. 33 ( 1, March) : 21 -53. 被引量:1
  • 9Kavanagh, D. and D. Richards (2001). Departementalism and Joined -Up Government: Back to the Future? Parliamentary Affairs, 54:1 -18. 被引量:1
  • 10Kettl, D.F. (2003). Contingent Coordination: Practical and Theoretical Puzzles for Homeland Security. American Review for Public Administration, 33 (September) : 253 -277. 被引量:1

共引文献491

同被引文献379

引证文献22

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈