期刊文献+

刑事诉讼中的司法证明规则 预览 被引量:12

On the judicial certification rules in criminal action
在线阅读 下载PDF
收藏 分享 导出
摘要 尽管刑事诉讼法在1996年进行了较大规模的修订,对抗制开始引入中国刑事司法制度,但是司法证明机制并没有在这一制度中确立起来.结果,不仅控辩双方的诉讼对抗容易出现混乱,而且法官对于诉讼进程似乎拥有无限的自由裁量权.因此,在未来的刑事证据法中,必须重新构建证明对象、证明责任、证明标准规则,使得法庭审判真正保持最基本的诉讼形态. Although criminal procedural law went through revision at a comparatively large scale in 1996,and the adversary procedure was introduced to China at the same time, the judicial certification rules were not established in the system. As a result, not only the litigious confrontation between accusing party and defending party is apt to be in chaos, but also judge seems to have infinite right of discretion in the litigious process. Therefore, in the future criminal evidence law, the rules about object of proof, burden of proof and standard of proof should be reestablished, in order to keep the most basic litigious conformation.
作者 陈瑞华 CHEN Rui-hua
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学论坛》 2003年第4期 13-22,共10页 Legal Forum
关键词 司法裁判 司法证明 证明责任 证明标准 Judicial adjudication Judicial certification Burden of proof Standard of proof
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1蔡敦铭.刑事诉讼法论[M].台湾:五南图书出版有限公司,1996.208-. 被引量:1
  • 2David Watt.Watt's Manual of Criminal Evidence[M].Thomson Canada Limited, 1998.141-142. 被引量:1
  • 3John Sopinka and others.The Law of Evidence in Canada[M].Butterworths Canada Limited, 1999.51-90. 被引量:1
  • 4Ronald J. Delisle.Canadian Evidence Law in a Nutshell[M].Thomson Canada Limited,1999.27-41. 被引量:1

同被引文献70

引证文献12

二级引证文献10

投稿分析

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部 意见反馈